Monthly Archives: February 2015
Following the budget speech in March 2014, the Chancellor has transformed the way in which people can take their pension benefits. Pensioners are being given more freedom than ever with their retirement savings.
Better Retirement is a firm of Chartered Financial Planners who specialise in helping clients get the best annuity for their individual circumstances and is one of the best known annuity experts in the UK. With over 20 years’ experience Better Retirement is well placed to help you
Equity release is a way of unlocking some of the value of your property without the need to move. The maximum amount of equity you are able to release depends on your age and the value of your property. However, if equity release is suitable for you, one of our specialist equity release advisers will help you to decide what you actually need, rather than just looking at the maximum available.
It is a plan that is much more flexible than an annuity, it allows you to draw a retirement income directly from your pension pot whilst leaving the rest invested. You choose where your remaining funds are invested and if your funds perform well, you may benefit from some growth over time.
Address: Better Retirement Group
Tadcaster, LS24 9JF
Phone: 0800 035 5934
Phone: 01937 222113
Business Hours: Monday-Friday – 9:00-5:30
Sapori di Napoli opened in February 2013. It is a family run restaurant owned & run by Pasquale. Pasquale was born and bred in Naples & wanted to bring a “taste of Naples” to Tadcaster. Pasquale’s aim is simple… to produce tasty & authentic Italian food in a relaxed & friendly atmosphere.
In true Italian style we welcome children & have a menu just for them “menu per bambini”
Sapori di Napoli Italian restaurant is NOW OPEN FOR SUNDAY LUNCH
(open from mid-day until 15:30).
Opening hours: Monday – Closed
Tuesday/Wednesday/Thursday -17:30 – 21:30
Friday – 12:00 – 14:00, 17:30-21:30
Saturday – 12:00 -14:00, 17:30 – 21:30
Early bird menu available Tues/Wed/Thurs (17:30 – 19:00) + Fri/Sat 17:30 – 18:00
We look forward to welcoming you so that you can experience the taste & warm welcome of Naples!
Sapori di Napoli
tel. 01937 835121 or 07742531366
The footpath, between Wighill Lane and Wetherby Road by way of the viaduct in Tadcaster, was used regularly by walkers, cyclists, and schoolchildren until it was blocked by a wall built by the landowners in February 2012.
Firstly I’d like to make a point of this – The new landowner bought an abandoned building with grounds to do with has he pleased. If you bought a house in Tadcaster which had a front gate and a back gate which people used for 15 years as a shortcut whilst the building was empty, would you let them continue to do so once you’d moved in and your children were playing in the garden? NO! of course you wouldn’t.
BUT! because the new landowner was Samuel Smith’s brewery everyone had to point the finger and blame Mr Humphrey Smith for the closure of the footpath. Over the past 3 years the opinions have gone from blaming Humphrey Smith directly to blaming him indirectly through the brewery – now it seems that the blame lies with the landowner’s newly appointed group called “Wharfebanks” which as we have been informed is a wholly owned subsidiary Samuel Smith brewery.
I have spoken to people casually about the blocked access through the old Barnardos grounds this year and during the town inquiry, most still say that Humphrey Smith is to blame as he wants to be the “Lord of the manor” (I heard this term used on several occasions over the past 3 years), also that Mr Smith bought it because he probably couldn’t get his way on some other matter so he’d done it out of spite. Some of the people who had opinions based the whole episode on the Council’s dislike to Mr Smith and probably wouldn’t even been here if it had been any other land owner or business which were involved.
Now I can only have my opinion so don’t ask me to name names of all the different people I spoke to as I have no idea, these chats took place in shops, pubs, restaurants, passing comments, bus stops and even doctors surgeries.
Actually talking about this does bring one thing about the inquiry to mind and has bugging me for a few days. I’ll try and explain this as best as I can but I’ve never studied law! Last week witnesses were called to give evidence based on paperwork written up by a Mr Jacobie (please excuse the spelling) of the Wharfedale legal team, these people had been summonsed to give evidence from signed statements which had been written for them – but NEVER signed! Now unless i’ve missed out the basic concept of a statement here, a statement always needs to be signed and witnessed before it becomes a legal statement. So it’s a bit like asking you to give evidence as a third party, why not get Mr Jacobie to read all of these statements out himself?
In last weeks hearing two witnesses were asked to read from the statement of an ex Barnardos employee to jog their memory to signs, gates and fences… So was that statement written by the person in question of by someone from the Wharfebank Legal team? Just asking the question as it seems that the term “witness statement” doesn’t carry true here! Any statements used by the CPS (Crown prosecution Service) must be signed and verified.
See also – Requirement to serve witness statements for use at trial… 32.4 (1) A witness statement is a written statement signed by a person which contains the evidence which that person would be allowed to give orally.
Campaigner Patrick Tunney said: “The path was used by many people for a very long time and it is almost a lifeline between one side of the town and the other.
“If we are successful it will be a reinstatement of what was the status quo and we are hoping the inspector will see the reasoning behind it and be able to award in our favour accordingly.
“We have put a lot of work into this and we knew it was not going to be easy. As a member of the community I owe it to others to try and have it reopened.”
The Wetherby News has learned that the fight against the closure of the path will be based on two criteria: the common law on the existence of a right of way and proof of 20 years’ use.
This statement comes from the Wetherby News 22nd January 2015…
Again, I’m not in anyone’s corner but reading this new clipping made me think… I don’t think anyone is disputing that the area in question was used as a footpath for over 20 years but whether you’re the first to trespass or the last person to trespass it’s still trespassing on someones property after all… As for proof that people used it as a cut through, why bother? people are at the Riley Smith Hall currently stating that they used it as far back as the 80’s. The second criteria: the common law on the existence of a right of way… I’ve checked with the Ordnance Survey maps and see no listing for a public footpath through that area. So from this paragraph I came to the conclusion that it’s a bit of a joke really to say that thousands of people have been using the cut through for so many years that they rightfully own it – Sorry if the Members of the action group in Tadcaster, Bernard Walford, Patrick Tunney, and Linda Bould don’t agree with me on this but it is private land as far as I can see…
They used it for recreation and exercise, they used it to go to school, and they used it to go to work. Right up until the route was closed off by a new landowner, NYCC was making plans with the previous landowner to open up a path as a cycle route across the river and a safe route to school.
Another clip from the same article…
If the previous owner was making plans to open up a path as a cycle path across the river for a safe way to school! was this discussed during the purchase of the property with the new land owner? If there was a mention of such plans then surely the email records and a statement from the seller would clear up this part. As we all know too well, just because someone has plans with their property, when they sell it the new owner has the right to change their mind…
Has the council approached the land owner and asked if the footpath was still a possibility? Has the council offered to buy a stretch of land 15 feet wide to turn into the required footpath from the land owner? Because all of this messing around of “he said she said” is going to get nowhere soon, and probably end up costing the residents of Tadcaster for the bill from the 3 week inquiry.
You never know, they have called witnesses who are pro the footpath so they may call Humphrey Smith himself to make a statement (it would be the fairest thing to do so that the people of Tadcaster could hear the reasons for themselves…
Well that’s my say for now, remember these are my opinions and summaries and should no be taken as literal as there may be flaws in the spellings etc! Hope to see more of the Tadcaster Residents at the Riley Smith Hall this coming week.
As normal, day two follows day one and the inquiry continues down the same path of mixed up paperwork and missing pages from reports.
I spent another two hours at the Riley Smith Hall in Tadcaster today listening to the inquiry into the Barnardo’s footpath case. Unfortunately due to work and other commitments an hour or two is all the time I have but it seems longer!
On arrival to the inquiry I could tell straight away that there was an adjournment as the three representatives of the Wharfebank legal team were all outside having a cigarette whilst pointing at a laptop screen, either that or everyone else had decided to go the the nearest cafe for a cup of tea.
Some of you may be aware of the battle between the Council and Wharfebanks ( A wholly owned subsidiary of Samuel Smith’s brewery) regarding the closure of the Bernardo’s footpath, walkway…
There is currently a hearing taking place at the Riley Smith Hall in Tadcaster to discuss the future of this walkway, whether it is in fact a public right of way or whether it should remain closed.
I attended the meeting this morning (which is expected to last 3 weeks – 10am til 5pm Monday to Friday daily). On the whole the meeting looked as though it was quite busy except for the noticeable shortage of Riverside School parents and past regular users of the Viaduct Walk area.